Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis

[SM <sm at resistor.net>]

Hi Dave,
At 13:08 23-06-2008, Dave Crocker wrote:
> For rfc2821bis, there was, in fact, an established discussion venue, 
> and it long-standing and quite well known to the email community, 
> namely ietf-smtp at imc.org.
>
> It could only have helped for that venue to have been known to 
> others, particularly if folks wanted to pursue a "community" 
> discussion about a concern with the draft.

Section 1.2 of the draft specifies where the document was being 
discussed.  I assume that people commenting on the draft would have read that.

Regards,
-sm  

___________From ietf-bounces at ietf.org  Thu Jun 26 11:24:55 2008
Return-Path: <ietf-bounces at ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive at megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive at core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A8843A69C9;
	Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:24:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf at core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf at core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E9383A69C9
	for <ietf at core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:24:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.299
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.300, 
	BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
	by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id qETOWW8vLNu3 for <ietf at core3.amsl.com>;
	Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:24:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ns1.qubic.net (ns1.qubic.net [208.69.177.116])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 987A23A6934
	for <ietf at ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:24:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from subman.resistor.net ([10.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0)
	by ns1.qubic.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id m5QIOYtf001255
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:24:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail;
	t=1214504683; x=1214591083; bh=tz9PdWpd7VWzBGNWPl/E958iwUrv4A1zZ3G5
	axHQ3mo=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:
	References:Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=F98CfNA7C6kUuTJzj3GbTi46BT
	qe8kdR0g1RuPQcwem1SN8/zX1xSqIwy0bbA0+HTwHYBhZ7q2ysyKv8coGJvCPkjTSqa
	d81ZYbsOMdPSZxhHxniiwD+bsSr1hWtXysu1GHjTCqnn6nrhgbiEYzwGtHty1Rt9i3z
	ApgL9zSf3j4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=mail; d=resistor.net; c=simple; q=dns;
	b=QbuqBgDQNSz0s/ju9wYoyIHHFl9NNfd5FHOA0t05c3MhGw6sfNe3m9cy80EEKef2M
	kGnPDoQXt4fdt8HXOvMLuHA5kJhtpSdBL6IVJPj5J8Wk0XtKXHV+u7hKy7Bc1dhrdhC
	RRawcdnvppeU1FXSJILvgrOTq1Qk2E+mJz6mqNo=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20080626111448.02cd7810 at resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:17:47 -0700
To: dcrocker at bbiw.net
From: SM <sm at resistor.net>
Subject: Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
In-Reply-To: <486002D3.9030900 at dcrocker.net>
References: <8832006D4D21836CBE6DB469 at klensin-asus.vbn.inter-touch.net>
	<485590E2.3080107 at gmail.com>
	<p06250116c47c330c7dd0 at [75.145.176.242]>
	<4856DE3A.3090804 at gmail.com>
	<C122F91B-59B0-49AC-ABBC-6752217C4E47 at NOKIA.COM>
	<20080619024147.9146C3A6938 at core3.amsl.com>
	<485A353B.30403 at dcrocker.net>
	<20080619175645.0CA443A68C2 at core3.amsl.com>
	<485FCAAF.9070808 at dcrocker.net>
	<200806231250.m5NCnuGh024638 at sbh17.songbird.com>
	<486002D3.9030900 at dcrocker.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf at ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>,
	<mailto:ietf-request at ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf at ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request at ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>,
	<mailto:ietf-request at ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: ietf-bounces at ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces at ietf.org

Hi Dave,
At 13:08 23-06-2008, Dave Crocker wrote:
> For rfc2821bis, there was, in fact, an established discussion venue, 
> and it long-standing and quite well known to the email community, 
> namely ietf-smtp at imc.org.
>
> It could only have helped for that venue to have been known to 
> others, particularly if folks wanted to pursue a "community" 
> discussion about a concern with the draft.

Section 1.2 of the draft specifies where the document was being 
discussed.  I assume that people commenting on the draft would have read that.

Regards,
-sm  

_______________________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


____________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf