Re: Subscriber List Damage

From: "Frank Ellermann" <nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de>
To: ietf at ietf.org
Cc: sip at ietf.org
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 09:07:30 +0200
References: <48671722.1020502 at amsl.com> <486962AA.3000800 at cisco.com><20080701014218.93BD5509A9 at romeo.rtfm.com> <486996AC.2050405 at amsl.com> <878wwmi02q.fsf at mocca.josefsson.org>

Simon Josefsson wrote:
 
> How about an IETF "operations" mailing list?  There is the tools
> mailing list, but I don't think this kind of operational discussions
> belong there.  People interested in the operations of various IETF
> servers could join that mailing list.  The list might even be an
> helpful resource for incidents like this.

+1  Ideally hosted elsewhere, but using mailman to check out things.

 Frank

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- Subscriber List Damage
  - From: Glen
- Re: Subscriber List Damage
  - From: Michael Thomas
- Re: Subscriber List Damage
  - From: Eric Rescorla
- Re: Subscriber List Damage
  - From: Glen
- Re: Subscriber List Damage
  - From: Simon Josefsson

Prev by Date: Re: Subscriber List Damage
Next by Date: RE: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity
Previous by thread: Re: Subscriber List Damage
Next by thread: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-smime-cms-rsa-kem-05
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Subscriber List Damage

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.