![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
<blush> Thanks! Steve On Jul 1, 2008, at 6:36 PM, John Levine wrote:
This does not mean that ICANN won't listen to the IETF; it means that there will be voices more familiar to ICANN saying things different than we are.One of the few ICANN committees that actually works is the SSAC, the Security and Stability Advisory Committee. It includes a lot of people we know, starting with Steve Crocker, the chair. I cannot ever recall a time when ICANN acted contrary to the advice of the SSAC. So although I agree that there's a lot not to like about ICANN, the chances that they will do technically dangerous things are low. http://www.icann.org/committees/security/ R's, John _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.