Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?

[Ole Jacobsen <ole at cisco.com>]

Paul,

But it is still the case that an application for say .local would need 
to go through some review process (regardless of price) which would 
include input from the IETF ICANN rep. I see little reason why or how
a TLD that would be damaging, confusing, or otherwise "bad" for the 
IETF would/could just "slip through" this process.

What am I missing here?

Ole

Ole J. Jacobsen
Editor and Publisher,  The Internet Protocol Journal
Cisco Systems
Tel: +1 408-527-8972   Mobile: +1 415-370-4628
E-mail: ole at cisco.com  URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf