RE: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?



Mark Andrews said:
 
"The Internet went to multi-label hostnames ~20 years ago.
We added ".ARPA" to all the single label hostnames as part
of that process. The only hold over is "localhost" and
that is implemeted locally, not in the global DNS.
 
No sane TLD operator can expect "http://tld" or "user at tld"
to work reliably. I suspect there are still mail configuations
around that will re-write "user at tld" to user at tld.ARPA.

Should we be writting a RFC which states that MX and address
records SHOULD NOT be added to the apex of a TLD zone?
 
Should we be writting a RFC which states that single label
hostnames/mail domains SHOULD NOT be looked up "as is" in
the DNS?"
 
Both sound like good ideas to me.  
 
 
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.