Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes?

["James Seng" <james at seng.sg>]

> At the moment, the condition is "no single Unicode code point." To
> the extent that a single CJK ideograph can be expressed using a
> single Unicode code point, this would represent the situation to
> which you say you would object. I will dig through my notes to find
> out why the "single character" condition was adopted -

Would you be able to explain why the condition is "no single Unicode
code point"? Whats the technical basis for that?

-James Seng
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf