![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Theodore Tso wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 02:13:47PM -0700, Ted Faber wrote:On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 05:01:30PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 01:38:28PM -0700, Ted Faber wrote:On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 01:32:10PM -0700, moore at network-heretics.com wrote:If you can cite verifiable evidence that even a single case that works reliably now, will cease to work, I'll concede that there is at least^^^^^^^^a hint of merit to your argument. e.g. an actual email address or URL that uses a single-label domain name.zod:~$ ping hk PING hk (203.119.2.28): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 203.119.2.28: icmp_seq=0 ttl=243 time=183.582 ms% ping hk. PING hk (203.119.2.28) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from www.hkdnr.hk (203.119.2.28): icmp_seq=1 ttl=238 time=265 ms 64 bytes from www.hkdnr.hk (203.119.2.28): icmp_seq=2 ttl=238 time=265 ms Not very reliably, I think. :-)Sorry, I cut and paste the wrong example. What I had meant to cut and paste: 5% ping hk PING hk.ibm.com (9.190.250.244) 56(84) bytes of data. ... - Ted
With your hk.ibm.com example, do you have any search lines in your /etc/resolv.conf file that would be automatically appending?
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailmanFrom ietf-bounces at ietf.org Mon Jul 7 14:52:17 2008 Return-Path: <ietf-bounces at ietf.org> X-Original-To: ietf-archive at megatron.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive at core3.amsl.com Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADB903A6B6A; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 14:52:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: ietf at core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietf at core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B37A3A6B69 for <ietf at core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 14:52:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pg80W9pMzSB6 for <ietf at core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 14:52:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp157.sat.emailsrvr.com (smtp157.sat.emailsrvr.com [66.216.121.157]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 472883A67CE for <ietf at ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 14:52:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay5.relay.sat.mlsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])by relay5.relay.sat.mlsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 5744823CED2; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 17:52:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by relay5.relay.sat.mlsrvr.com (Authenticated sender:willie.gillespie-AT-es2eng.com) with ESMTP id BFC5723CEF3; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 17:52:14 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <487290FA.8020702 at es2eng.com> Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 15:56:10 -0600 From: Willie Gillespie <wgillespie+ietf at es2eng.com> Organization: Engineering System Solutions User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080505) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Theodore Tso <tytso at MIT.EDU> Subject: Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ? References: <20080707133210.AWH55905 at m1.imap-partners.net> <20080707203828.GC2300 at zod.isi.edu> <20080707210130.GT31490 at mit.edu> <20080707211347.GB2222 at zod.isi.edu> <20080707214214.GX31490 at mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <20080707214214.GX31490 at mit.edu> Cc: ietf at ietf.org X-BeenThere: ietf at ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request at ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Post: <mailto:ietf at ietf.org> List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request at ietf.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request at ietf.org?subject=subscribe> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: ietf-bounces at ietf.org Errors-To: ietf-bounces at ietf.org Theodore Tso wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 02:13:47PM -0700, Ted Faber wrote:On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 05:01:30PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 01:38:28PM -0700, Ted Faber wrote:On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 01:32:10PM -0700, moore at network-heretics.com wrote:If you can cite verifiable evidence that even a single case that works reliably now, will cease to work, I'll concede that there is at least^^^^^^^^a hint of merit to your argument. e.g. an actual email address or URL that uses a single-label domain name.zod:~$ ping hk PING hk (203.119.2.28): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 203.119.2.28: icmp_seq=0 ttl=243 time=183.582 ms% ping hk. PING hk (203.119.2.28) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from www.hkdnr.hk (203.119.2.28): icmp_seq=1 ttl=238 time=265 ms 64 bytes from www.hkdnr.hk (203.119.2.28): icmp_seq=2 ttl=238 time=265 ms Not very reliably, I think. :-)Sorry, I cut and paste the wrong example. What I had meant to cut and paste: 5% ping hk PING hk.ibm.com (9.190.250.244) 56(84) bytes of data. ... - Ted
With your hk.ibm.com example, do you have any search lines in your /etc/resolv.conf file that would be automatically appending?
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinf/listinfo/ietf o/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.