Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?



Bill Manning wrote:

> http://www.icann.org/committees/security/sac032.pdf
> is illustrative.

| entrusted agents should provide opt-out mechanisms that
| allows clients to receive the original DNS answers to
| their queries.

[...]

| Organizations that rely on accurate NXDomain reporting
| for operational stability should choose an entrusted
| agent that asserts it will not modify DNS responses in
| its terms of service.

Certainly "illustrative" , but not affecting 2606bis ;-)

 Frank

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf



Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.