Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?

From: "James Seng" <james at seng.sg>
To: "Dave Crocker" <dcrocker at bbiw.net>
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf at jck.com>, IETF Discussion <ietf at ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 09:36:57 +0800
In-reply-to: <4872BF88.5040706 at bbiw.net>
References: <200807022323.m62NNwVJ034275 at drugs.dv.isc.org> <BLU137-W18376D2DBA85C8F712C06F93980 at phx.gbl> <8953A1CE-E953-409F-A692-BD12DF4ADE61 at acm.org> <48724347.6020500 at dcrocker.net> <18BA25DED8BFD9F794A10E84 at p3.JCK.COM> <4872BF88.5040706 at bbiw.net>

> And all of the questions I asked 10 years ago said that TLDs on that latter
> scale would be problematic to the root.

Was that pre-Anycast or post-Anycast?

-James Seng
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?
  - From: Joe Abley
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?
  - From: Dave Crocker

References:
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?
  - From: Mark Andrews
- RE: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?
  - From: Bernard Aboba
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?
  - From: Lyman Chapin
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?
  - From: Dave Crocker
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?
  - From: John C Klensin
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?
  - From: Dave Crocker

Prev by Date: Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?
Next by Date: Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?
Previous by thread: Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?
Next by thread: Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.