Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?



On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 05:11:35PM -0400, Keith Moore wrote:
> And vanity TLDs are going to be much more attractive if people think 
> they can get single-label host names out of them.

Of your concerns (which I don't have the relevant experience to comment
on in detail), this seems to be fairly small and speculative to me.

Time will tell.

-- 
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber           PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG

Attachment: pgp5tzrZeUrEt.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.