Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73

[Eliot Lear <lear at cisco.com>]

Fred Baker wrote:
> On Jul 18, 2008, at 7:50 AM, Cyrus Daboo wrote:
>
> > Rather than expanding the number of slots why don't we look at using 
> > the time we have more efficiently.
>
> Let me throw in v6ops as an example. We are very efficient, I think - 
> we have 10-15 minute discussions on each of a number of drafts in our 
> time. I would often like to allow a discussion to be longer, for the 
> same reason that we meet f2f in the first place - we'd like to get all 
> the opinions on the table and come to some sense of closure. I am 
> having two meetings in the course of the week and finding myself 
> rushing discussions along.

My recollection is that you do publicize the agenda well in advance, and 
that's a big improvement over many working groups.  Here's the real 
question, Fred: when you guys go through your meetings, how much could 
have been done as a VoD?  What I mean by that is how much discussion 
occurs on each particular presentation?  This might be something for 
chairs to measure at Dublin as input into this process.

Eliot
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf