![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
"Teleconferencing", in this context, includes any communications vehicle that enables participants to meet without having to travel, and which they all agree to. Could be telephone, skype with or without video, Marratech, Webex, Citrix, or anything else as long as they all agree.
On Jul 21, 2008, at 11:30 AM, <michael.dillon at bt.com> <michael.dillon at bt.com > wrote:
To elaborate, my understanding is that the rules forteleconferencingare governed by the rules for interim meetings, which require something like one month's advance notice plus attendancerequirementsat the previous IETF, and a minimum period of time betweenmeetings.I will also note that telling people they cannot meet to discuss things is about as effective as telling water it cannot flow downhill.In any case, what is "teleconferencing"? Does it include someone running a realtime meeting on an IM service? Note that these days, IM services can include video and audio.If you use a service like that provided by webex.com does that make it ateleconference? If you have an audio conference call using SIP/VoIP over the Internet, is that a teleconference?One wonders why the IETF persists in using old technology long after thereal world has shifted to leveraging the very technology that the IETF created in the first place? Really, the place for experiments is to supplement mailing lists with a variety of other Internet-basedinteraction technologies. Experiment with various of these possibilities and find out what works. This should take the load off the face-to- facemeetings so that there is no need to extend IETF meetings. Maybe they could even be shortened? --Michael Dillon _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.