Re: Missing Materials

[Dean Willis <dean.willis at softarmor.com>]

On Jul 24, 2008, at 9:39 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> As I have done for previous IETFs I just ran getdrafts
> (http://tools.ietf.org/tools/getdrafts/) on the entire agenda
> and what follows is the output. As you can see, a pretty substantial
> number of WGs are without agendas, about 10% of the drafts listed
> are wrong, and about half of those appear to be simple version
> errors.

...
>  draft-willis-sip-infopackage-00.txt (wg=sip)

Or it could be that I put a draft that expired 4 years ago (but is  
still in our various secondary servers) on the reading list for a  
discussion, because it's pretty annoying that we're still trying to  
decide on whether or not we have consensus to fix the problem 4 years  
later.

Since the agenda I posted is HTML and the draft is linked into that  
agenda (which everybody SHOULD do, I believe), I suspect it's a  
question of the getdrafts tool not doing the right thing. Perhaps it  
should use the agenda's link if there is one?

Also, drafts are often revised after agenda are posted. Maybe  
getdrafts should just pull the latest version?

--
Dean

 
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf