![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
I don't know what "accredited" means anymore.
IMHO it should mean "real journalists" in this context. That excludes technical experts who play at journalism on their blog.
Right, we wouldn't want to encourage reporting by people who actually know what they're talking about...
Anyway: face it, everyone, even reporters, has opinions, and everyone, even "technical experts" can write about the IETF.
What would the goal of accreditation be?
After all, there are no restrictions on non-journalists writing anything that they want so the IETF doesn't lose anything by restricting a press conference to people whose dayjob is journalism.
Except openness.
These days, the analogous issue is whether or not bloggers are "real" journalists. I would hope that most IETFers would object to that distinction.
You can't object to a technical fact. Of course then there is the clarity of terminology, so lets define journalist as someone who is paid to write articles for a publication and who is at IETF to do their dayjob.
A more useful distinction would be that if journalists get in for free, they only get to listen in meetings, not talk.
This definition does exclude people like me who are not currently paid to write and who only write on things like blogs and mailing lists.
It doesn't exclude me, though.
To put it bluntly, I'm not at all in favor of trying to manage news coverage, especially by organizational mechanisms.
My suggestion was not about managing new coverage at all, but about providing a venue for a specific section of the attendees that have special needs.
I would suggest that if the IETF wants more accurate press coverage, it should, along with managing expectations, produce press releases. For most meetings, I don't think the number of tech journalists that would show up is sufficient to warrant press conferences, although it might in places like San Francisco.
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.