Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?

[John C Klensin <john-ietf at jck.com>]

Paul,

FWIW, this works for me.

One quibble: I would suggest that moderation for spam, drivel, 
and duplicates ought to be a reasonable Secretariat (or IAD, or 
IAD-assigned) task.   If the IETF and IAB chair don't have 
better things to do with their time than to moderate this sort 
of posting, then I suggest a small committee be formed to start 
working on a list, perhaps to report back to the RFC Editor well 
before the end of March :-(.   In addition, having a volunteer 
make those decisions could easily lead to claims of conflict of 
interest and we don't want to go there.

   john


--On Friday, August 15, 2008 10:15 AM -0700 Paul Hoffman 
<paul.hoffman at vpnc.org> wrote:

> It seems like there is a lot of concern about removals, and
> some concern about original publication of spam, drivel, and
> duplicate notices. Here is a proposal for a way forward:
>
> 1) Original submissions to the IPR repository are moderated,
> but only to prevent publication of spam and drivel. If the
> moderator (who should probably be a NomCom-appointed person
> such as the IETF chair or IAB chair) sees what appears to be a
> ...


    john

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf