Re: authorizing subsequent use of contributions
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: authorizing subsequent use of contributions



"Powers Chuck-RXCP20" <Chuck.Powers at motorola.com> writes:

> IMO this simply underscores the valid separation of patent
> rights and copyright rights in the IETF process, that some still seem to
> be confused over.

Indeed, and I believe that various IETF documents' prolific use of the
term "IPR" has significantly added to this confusion.  I suggest that we
say "patent" if we refer to patents, and say "copyright" if we refer to
copyrights.  Patents and copyrights are quite different beasts and it
hurts clarity to refer to them with the "IPR" term, a term that also
covers other things which are rarely intended.

/Simon
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf



Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.