![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Todd Glassey----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian E Carpenter" <brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com>
To: "Ted Hardie" <hardie at qualcomm.com>Cc: "John C Klensin" <john-ietf at jck.com>; "Simon Josefsson" <simon at josefsson.org>; "Powers Chuck-RXCP20" <Chuck.Powers at motorola.com>; "IETF Discussion" <>
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 3:10 PM Subject: Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
On 2008-08-16 10:48, Ted Hardie wrote: ...Reading through this, I see that the recommendation that an IPR discloser "withdraw a previous disclosure if a revised Contribution negates the previous IPR disclosure" made it into the BCP. Someone else will have to decide if this is already consonant with Paul's suggestion, or whether it would have to be amended."Withdraw" does not imply "remove", of course. To me, it has always meant "update the existing disclosure to state that it does not apply to the later draft." It still applies to the earlier draft, and that earlier draft is still an IETF Contribution for all eternity. Brian _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.