Re: Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal

From: "Tim Bray" <tbray at textuality.com>
To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke at gmx.de>
Cc: ietf at ietf.org, Keith Moore <moore at network-heretics.com>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman at vpnc.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:09:34 -0700
In-reply-to: <48B58678.3020801 at gmx.de>
References: <20080826204601.44F783A6849 at core3.amsl.com> <p06240814c4db2bb0c498 at 10.20.30.152> <48B57DD0.10805 at gmx.de> <48B584A7.6040202 at network-heretics.com> <48B58678.3020801 at gmx.de>

On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de> wrote:

>> I'm not saying [X]HTML RFCs are an inherently bad idea, just that
>> they're not as simple to get right as it might seem.
>
> That's true, but I would expect *less* discussions as compared to just
> using PDF (for everything).

Agreed on all points.  For those of us who spend any significant
amount of time working with RFCs on-screen, it seems like a minimal,
clean, HTML presentation has been the best available technology for
about a decade now.  -Tim
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal
  - From: Russ Housley
- Re: Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal
  - From: Julian Reschke
- Re: Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal
  - From: Keith Moore
- Re: Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal
  - From: Julian Reschke

Prev by Date: Re: Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal
Next by Date: Re: Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal
Previous by thread: Re: Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal
Next by thread: Re: Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.