Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07

From: Bob Braden <braden at ISI.EDU>
To: "Spencer Dawkins" <spencer at wonderhamster.org>
Cc: ietf at ietf.org, General Area Review Team <gen-art at ietf.org>, Ross Callon <rcallon at juniper.net>, Patrick Droz <dro at zurich.ibm.com>, Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi at znyx.com>, rha at zurich.ibm.com
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 09:16:51 -0700
In-reply-to: <DA8C57C76C304B95B0CFD728A79018AE at china.huawei.com>
References: <DA8C57C76C304B95B0CFD728A79018AE at china.huawei.com>

>
>
>
>Summary: This document is very close to ready for publication as a Proposed
>Standard. I have two technical comments below, but both are minor issues
>that could resolved in AUTH48 if you think they have merit.

An aside: The purpose of AUTH48 state is not (should not be) to resolve 
even minor issues.  Ideally, no issues should arise in AUTH48, but the 
world is not a perfect place.  But let's not get in the habit of sweeping 
minor changes to the every end of the publication process.  The revision 
process is pretty cheap.

Bob Braden


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
  - From: Spencer Dawkins
- Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
  - From: Paul Hoffman

References:
- Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
  - From: Spencer Dawkins

Prev by Date: Re: IESG Statement on Revised guidance for interim meetings
Next by Date: Re: IESG Statement on Revised guidance for interim meetings
Previous by thread: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
Next by thread: Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.