Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07

["Spencer Dawkins" <spencer at wonderhamster.org>]

To John and Steve,

>> It occurs to me that people may have been saying "could be
>> resolved in AUTH48" when they really meant "could be resolved in
>> an RFC Editor note".

I would not be a bit surprised if I meant that ;-)

> Personally, I don't even like RFC Editor notes for things that can and
> should be corrected by the author.  As both an author and an AD, I much
> preferred clean new copies.

My own AD feels the same way, for reasonable reasons.

I do note that spinning revisions also activates all the review team 
reviewers to figure out what's changed since (in this case) 07. It's worth 
noting that although the ID submission tool has made submitting a 08 version 
very cheap, it's not free...

Thanks.

Spencer 

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf