Re: Last Call: RFC2183 to obsolete RFC1806

From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa at osafoundation.org>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf at jck.com>
Cc: ietf at ietf.org, Keith Moore <moore at network-heretics.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 13:37:29 -0700
In-reply-to: <4E962135073EAA822AB5B1EC at p3.JCK.COM>
References: <20080903223223.D290C3A6B99 at core3.amsl.com> <4E962135073EAA822AB5B1EC at p3.JCK.COM>

On Sep 8, 2008, at 5:06 AM, John C Klensin wrote:

>
> Please reserve Last Calls for situations in which community
> input or demonstrations of community consensus are actually
> needed.

Perhaps an announcement specifically calling out the approval of the  
errata would have been better.  I was trying to make sure there was a  
public record of the intent or fait accompli of obsoleting RFC1806 --  
since errata don't normally have IETF-announce postings associated.

Thanks,
Lisa
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Last Call: RFC2183 to obsolete RFC1806
  - From: Harald Alvestrand

References:
- Last Call: RFC2183 to obsolete RFC1806
  - From: The IESG
- Re: Last Call: RFC2183 to obsolete RFC1806
  - From: John C Klensin

Prev by Date: Encoding of extention marker
Next by Date: Re: The RFC Editor and the Internet Standards Process
Previous by thread: Re: Last Call: RFC2183 to obsolete RFC1806
Next by thread: Re: Last Call: RFC2183 to obsolete RFC1806
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Last Call: RFC2183 to obsolete RFC1806

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.