Re: IESG Statement on Revised guidance for interim meetings

From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy at cisco.com>
To: dcrocker at bbiw.net
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf at ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:25:52 -0600
In-reply-to: <48BDACB6.2010309 at dcrocker.net>
References: <20080902170001.90AF73A6BCF at core3.amsl.com> <48BD74DE.7010008 at dcrocker.net> <20080902174249.05DAB3A684A at core3.amsl.com> <48BDACB6.2010309 at dcrocker.net>

On Sep 2, 2008, at 3:14 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote:

>> 7. Illusions of unanimity among group members, silence is viewed as
>> agreement.

Well that's and interesting point to consider when looking at the  
average IETF Last Call.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- IESG Statement on Revised guidance for interim meetings
  - From: IESG Secretary
- Re: IESG Statement on Revised guidance for interim meetings
  - From: Dave CROCKER
- Re: IESG Statement on Revised guidance for interim meetings
  - From: Russ Housley
- Re: IESG Statement on Revised guidance for interim meetings
  - From: Dave CROCKER

Prev by Date: Re: Strong Opposition due to spam backscatter. Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject-07 and -08 (Sieve Email Filtering: Reject and Extended Reject Extensions) to Proposed Standard
Next by Date: Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org
Previous by thread: Re: IESG Statement on Revised guidance for interim meetings
Next by thread: Re: IESG Statement on Revised guidance for interim meetings
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: IESG Statement on Revised guidance for interim meetings

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.