Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples

[Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer at nic.fr>]

On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:34:46AM +0200,
 Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund at ericsson.com> wrote 
 a message of 122 lines which said:

> > I note with even more interest that reservation of "codepoints"
> > for example or other documentation purposes would violate existing
> > IESG statements and rules about conservation of scarce resources
> > (where scarcity is an issue) or would require negotiation with
> > other bodies.
> > 
> 
> Which IESG statements are you referring to? 

The rules I'm personally concerned about when reading the proposed
IESG statement are:

RFC 5236, section 3.3 (which mentions "scarcity")

RFC 5237 for an example in a densely populated field

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf