Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples

From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer at nic.fr>
To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund at ericsson.com>
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf at jck.com>, ietf at ietf.org
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 13:43:52 +0200
In-reply-to: <48D388AE.30104 at ericsson.com>
References: <20080918170712.83D173A6A7F at core3.amsl.com> <90DF2902DD415710EEFF5699 at p3.int.jck.com> <48D36426.7020901 at ericsson.com> <20080919093038.GA23478 at nic.fr> <48D388AE.30104 at ericsson.com>

On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 01:10:38PM +0200,
 Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund at ericsson.com> wrote 
 a message of 50 lines which said:

>> RFC 5236, section 3.3 (which mentions "scarcity")
>
> Do you mean another RFC,

Yes, that was RFC 5226, sorry.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
  - From: The IESG
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
  - From: John C Klensin
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
  - From: Magnus Westerlund
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
  - From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
  - From: Magnus Westerlund

Prev by Date: Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
Next by Date: Re: IETF copying conditions
Previous by thread: Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
Next by thread: RE: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.