RE: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples

[<Pasi.Eronen at nokia.com>]

John C Klensin wrote:

> I continue to believe that the IESG could do something much easier
> and much more effective by issuing, not a collection of new rules,
> but a simple statement requiring that people either use
> suitably-reserved and dedicated identifiers or that they explain,
> explicitly and subject to community review, why not.  

I think that's pretty much what we tried to do, but apparently,
the text doesn't quite read that way (and I agree that it's quite
long).

Best regards,
Pasi
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf