Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples

[SM <sm at resistor.net>]

At 03:01 22-09-2008, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
> As I stated in response to John's question. No, the spam problem for 
> us contributors are one of the prices to contribute to IETF unfortunately.

Item (1) takes us one step closer to discouraging the publication of 
email addresses instead of seeing it as one of the prices to pay for 
contributing to the IETF.  I suggest dropping item (1) from the 
proposed statement.

> > Will authors have to seek the permission from the holders, in the 
> > case of domain names (e.g. www.w3.org), before using such domains in RFCs?
>
> Depends fully on the context. In a reference I clearly say no. In a 
> configuration script or as point to load validation data from, definitely!

That sounds sensible at the outset.  The following question is for a 
specific case.  Will the IESG ask (I-D) authors to seek permission 
from the W3C before using the domain name in XML schemas?

Regards,
-sm 

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf