Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples

From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf at mit.edu>
To: "Spencer Dawkins" <spencer at wonderhamster.org>
Cc: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund at ericsson.com>, ietf at ietf.org, John Leslie <john at jlc.net>, dcrocker at bbiw.net
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:58:08 -0400
In-reply-to: <F201422CEE324790848AAB7960EF28D4 at china.huawei.com> (Spencer Dawkins's message of "Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:19:01 -0500")
References: <20080918170712.83D173A6A7F at core3.amsl.com> <90DF2902DD415710EEFF5699 at p3.int.jck.com> <48D78849.60901 at ericsson.com> <43EE4CB8051145B7865A3C00819B1459 at DGBP7M81> <48D7A514.6060308 at ericsson.com> <48D7B79E.9070507 at dcrocker.net> <48D8EA0E.8010204 at ericsson.com> <48D934EA.2010706 at dcrocker.net> <20080923191058.GN55662 at verdi> <F201422CEE324790848AAB7960EF28D4 at china.huawei.com>

>>>>> "Spencer" == Spencer Dawkins <spencer at wonderhamster.org> writes:

    Spencer> Out of the eleventy-seven flavors of DISCUSS, some ARE
    Spencer> blocking. Others aren't intended to survive the first
    Spencer> telechat ("process DISCUSS", or "discuss DISCUSS", and
    Spencer> after sitting with the IESG for three years I don't know
    Spencer> if these are the same or not). All wear the same nametag.

All discusses are blocking.  Some discusses are intended to be removed
either before their blockage slows anything down, or before some
point.


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
  - From: The IESG
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
  - From: John C Klensin
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
  - From: Magnus Westerlund
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
  - From: Doug Ewell
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
  - From: Magnus Westerlund
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
  - From: Dave CROCKER
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
  - From: Magnus Westerlund
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
  - From: Dave CROCKER
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
  - From: John Leslie
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
  - From: Spencer Dawkins

Prev by Date: Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
Next by Date: Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-usefor-usepro (Netnews Architecture and Protocols) to Proposed Standard
Previous by thread: Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
Next by thread: Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.