Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples

From: Dave CROCKER <dcrocker at bbiw.net>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf at jck.com>
Cc: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund at ericsson.com>, ietf at ietf.org
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 10:01:54 -0400
In-reply-to: <002C61D09CE7B135B04EFCA6 at p3.int.jck.com>
References: <48D584879F297C944CE2D568 at JCK-ACR.jck.com> <48D9F2CC.6010605 at ericsson.com> <002C61D09CE7B135B04EFCA6 at p3.int.jck.com>



John C Klensin wrote:

But I hope that the issue the IESG is discussing is focused on
the granularity and appropriateness of these types of rules
because, from my point of view, "how much time does it take to
get it right and how else could that time be spent" are the key
questions, not the issue about what names/identifiers should be
used in examples.. especially in normal, new document, cases.



+10

d/
--

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
  - From: John C Klensin
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
  - From: Magnus Westerlund
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
  - From: John C Klensin

Prev by Date: draft-crocker-rfc-media-00.txt (was: Re: Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal)
Next by Date: IETF mail-lists outbound server being exploited
Previous by thread: Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
Next by thread: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-forces-model-14
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.