Re: RFC 2026 interpretation question

[Dave CROCKER <dhc2 at dcrocker.net>]

John C Klensin wrote:
> Put differently, do you believe that it is useful to get this
> "starting point" glitch fixed or do you feel a need to block it
> until we can reopen and resolve a large collection of issues
> about which we have never been able to establish consensus in
> the past?  


John,

My posting was intended to respond only to the specific and immediate question 
of when the inter-status minimum clock starts ticking that you original asked.

The only ambiguity I intended to offer was a personal preference for a 
different, specific choice, but an inability to generate logic that justified it.

Like you, I would much rather have strategic changes pursued seriously and 
adopted constructively, but that wasn't your original question and I didn't 
intend to raise it.

d/

--

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf