Re: RFC 2141 - URN Syntax

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RFC 2141 - URN Syntax

From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov at isode.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de>
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf at ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 13:44:01 +0100
In-reply-to: <48EA050B.4080505 at gmx.de>
References: <48EA050B.4080505 at gmx.de>

Julian Reschke wrote:

Hi,
I was looking at <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2141> (URN syntax) andnoticed that it's only a proposed standard. There do not seem to beany errata recorded(<http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=2141>).
Would there be any objections if I tried to update the stuff thatneeds to be updated (references, ABNF), and submit as Draft Standard?


This seems sensible.
Have you tried to ping the original author?

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC 2141 - URN Syntax
  - From: Julian Reschke

References:
- RFC 2141 - URN Syntax
  - From: Julian Reschke

Prev by Date: RFC 2141 - URN Syntax
Next by Date: Re: RFC 2141 - URN Syntax
Previous by thread: RFC 2141 - URN Syntax
Next by thread: Re: RFC 2141 - URN Syntax
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.