Re: RFC 2141 - URN Syntax

From: "Rémi Denis-Courmont" <remi.denis-courmont at nokia.com>
To: ietf at ietf.org
Cc: ext Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 15:54:06 +0300
In-reply-to: <48EA050B.4080505 at gmx.de>
References: <48EA050B.4080505 at gmx.de>

On Monday 06 October 2008 15:31:07 ext Julian Reschke, you wrote:
> Would there be any objections if I tried to update the stuff that needs
> to be updated (references, ABNF), and submit as Draft Standard?

As far as I know, there is no need to resubmit a new version of the document 
to advance its standard status. See RFC2026. What matters is, it's in 
Standards Tracks in the first place.

Unless there are non-editorial corrections/updates to be made, this looks like 
a waste of time to me.

-- 
Rémi Denis-Courmont
Maemo Software, Nokia Devices R&D
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC 2141 - URN Syntax
  - From: Julian Reschke

References:
- RFC 2141 - URN Syntax
  - From: Julian Reschke

Prev by Date: Re: RFC 2141 - URN Syntax
Next by Date: Re: RFC 2141 - URN Syntax
Previous by thread: Re: RFC 2141 - URN Syntax
Next by thread: Re: RFC 2141 - URN Syntax
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: RFC 2141 - URN Syntax

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.