Re: RFC 2141 - URN Syntax

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov at isode.com>
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf at ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:55:01 +0200
In-reply-to: <48EA0811.4000408 at isode.com>
References: <48EA050B.4080505 at gmx.de> <48EA0811.4000408 at isode.com>

Alexey Melnikov wrote:

I was looking at <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2141> (URN syntax) andnoticed that it's only a proposed standard. There do not seem to beany errata recorded(<http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=2141>).
Would there be any objections if I tried to update the stuff thatneeds to be updated (references, ABNF), and submit as Draft Standard?
This seems sensible.
Have you tried to ping the original author?


Yes, but at the same time I wrote the mail above.

BR, Julian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- RFC 2141 - URN Syntax
  - From: Julian Reschke
- Re: RFC 2141 - URN Syntax
  - From: Alexey Melnikov

Prev by Date: Re: RFC 2141 - URN Syntax
Next by Date: Re: RFC 2141 - URN Syntax
Previous by thread: Re: RFC 2141 - URN Syntax
Next by thread: Re: RFC 2141 - URN Syntax
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: RFC 2141 - URN Syntax

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.