Re: RFC 2141 - URN Syntax

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de>
To: Rémi Denis-Courmont <remi.denis-courmont at nokia.com>
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 15:10:41 +0200
In-reply-to: <200810061554.06549.remi.denis-courmont at nokia.com>
References: <48EA050B.4080505 at gmx.de> <200810061554.06549.remi.denis-courmont at nokia.com>

Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:

On Monday 06 October 2008 15:31:07 ext Julian Reschke, you wrote:
Would there be any objections if I tried to update the stuff that needs
to be updated (references, ABNF), and submit as Draft Standard?
As far as I know, there is no need to resubmit a new version of the documentto advance its standard status. See RFC2026. What matters is, it's inStandards Tracks in the first place.
Unless there are non-editorial corrections/updates to be made, this looks likea waste of time to me.

Well, it has normative references to things that have been obsoletedsince and it doesn't use ABNF, so I *do* think it needs a minor freshup.


BR, Julian

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC 2141 - URN Syntax
  - From: Ted Hardie

References:
- RFC 2141 - URN Syntax
  - From: Julian Reschke
- Re: RFC 2141 - URN Syntax
  - From: Rémi Denis-Courmont

Prev by Date: Re: RFC 2141 - URN Syntax
Next by Date: Re: Call for Comments: Principles of Internet Host Configuration
Previous by thread: Re: RFC 2141 - URN Syntax
Next by thread: Re: RFC 2141 - URN Syntax
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: RFC 2141 - URN Syntax

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.