Re: draft-hoffman-utf8-rfcs-03.txt

From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman at vpnc.org>
To: ietf at ietf.org
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 14:25:18 -0700
In-reply-to: <6A6CCFAFA34481AB9DE5C038 at p3.int.jck.com>
References: <6A6CCFAFA34481AB9DE5C038 at p3.int.jck.com>

At 2:38 PM -0400 10/6/08, John C Klensin wrote:
>(1) A mailing list for discussion is not designated.  While I
>would normally suggested rfc-interest, the document appears to
>be written on the assumption that approval of this proposal
>rests with the IETF (presumably via the IESG) and IAOC and not
>with the RFC Editor (with presumed review by the IAB), so I am
>sending to this list.

An earlier thread had already moved the discussion to rfc-interest, and I think it is more productive to have this discussed in one place. There is already an active discussion going on over there. I will put a note to that effect in the -04 version.

If the document moves to IETF Last Call, it will certainly get discussed here.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- draft-hoffman-utf8-rfcs-03.txt
  - From: John C Klensin

Prev by Date: Re: draft-hoffman-utf8-rfcs-03.txt
Next by Date: Re: RFC 2141 - URN Syntax
Previous by thread: RE: draft-hoffman-utf8-rfcs-03.txt
Next by thread: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-06 in last call?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: draft-hoffman-utf8-rfcs-03.txt

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.