Re: a modern-day SNMP use
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: a modern-day SNMP use



David W. Hankins wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 09:41:49AM -0700, Randy Presuhn wrote:
>> All very good reasons why doing blind, single-variable MIB walks
>> makes no sense.   Are there any commercial products that
>> do this routinely?  I'm not aware of any.

Adding to David,

IASON originally did a lot with SNMP, because of catalysts :)

We used Open Source snmpwalk because that was the easiest way to go.

When we added boxes and MIBs we got into trouble and out of memory.

As David observed, SNMP used to be slow and consumed a lot of cpu on
both the monitor and the monitored boxes.

We dropped SNMP finally when we moved away from the catalysts.

IASON never went commercial but is in the Open Source now and still very
pre beta.

Kind Regards
Peter

-- 
Peter and Karin Dambier
Cesidian Root - Radice Cesidiana
Rimbacher Strasse 16
D-69509 Moerlenbach-Bonsweiher
+49(6209)795-816 (Telekom)
+49(6252)750-308 (VoIP: sipgate.de)
mail: peter at peter-dambier.de
http://www.peter-dambier.de/
http://iason.site.voila.fr/
https://sourceforge.net/projects/iason/
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf



Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.