![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
----- Original Message ----- From: "Douglas Otis" <dotis at mail-abuse.org>
To: "Michael Dillon" <michael.dillon at bt.com> Cc: <ietf at ietf.org>; <ipr-wg at ietf.org> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 9:24 AM Subject: Re: placing a dollar value on IETF IP.
On Oct 28, 2008, at 8:03 AM, <michael.dillon at bt.com> <michael.dillon at bt.com> wrote:Interoperability of standards is a hard-won prize, whether in the IETF or elsewhere. The cost of producing documents is a mere drop in the bucket. In addition, cost is a very slippery thing to get ahold of because of the difference between expenses and investments.Agreed. The prize may go to the influential, rather than being decided on merit. In the end, it is often about either supporting a service or the cost of a service. The goal, and not the cost, is what is important.
Which Doug is why the IETF needs to be totally open and transparent. Let the market decide on whether a standard gets acceptance or not.
The IETF's process should be totally revamped so that there is NO VOTING on anything other than what a standard will be for a given initiative when that initiative is approved. From that point on its only about whether the standards process meets its interim milestones. There is NO OTHER way to make the IETF fair for all concerned.
Todd
-Doug _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.comVersion: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.8.4/1752 - Release Date: 10/28/2008 10:04 AM
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.