Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-isis-hmac-sha-05
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-isis-hmac-sha-05
- From: Ben Campbell <ben at nostrum.com>
- To: Ben Campbell <ben at estacado.net>
- Cc: ietf at ietf.org, vishwas at ipinfusion.com, mfanto at ciber.com, General Area Review Team <gen-art at ietf.org>, tony.li at tony.li, dward at cisco.com, rcallon at juniper.net, manav at alcatel-lucent.com, RJ Atkinson <rja at extremenetworks.com>, riw at cisco.com
- Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 20:38:58 -0500
- In-reply-to: <3CFD2A7F-1D0F-49F4-9D1D-2EF3E0905153 at estacado.net>
- References: <3CFD2A7F-1D0F-49F4-9D1D-2EF3E0905153 at estacado.net>
I made an editorial comment in my gen-art review of draft-ietf-isis-
hmac-sha-05, below:
On Oct 28, 2008, at 4:37 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
-- Section 8
The author list here does not match the first page. Should some of
these move to a "Contributors" section?
I have since had off-line discussions to indicate:
1) The RFC editor policy allows this difference in general, and
2) Even if they didn't, this draft is the product of merging two
original drafts, which resulted in the current author list. That is,
the author list seems reasonable in this specific case.
Therefore, I withdraw that comment.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions
of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
