Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-isis-hmac-sha-05

[Ben Campbell <ben at estacado.net>]

On Oct 29, 2008, at 6:37 PM, Bhatia, Manav (Manav) wrote:

> > (On the other hand, since this is a MAY, it's probably less of an
> > issue than if it were a stronger normative statement.)
>
> Upon rereading this particular text I realize that its redundant and  
> can
> be safely pruned. This is because implementations that don't support
> this draft are anyways going to accept the PDUs as per the  
> standards. I
> was only trying to restate the obvious.
>
> Will remove this in the revised ID.

I don't object to removing it--but if you think that saying it  
provides any help for implementers of this extension, you could also  
fix this by merely stating it in non-normative language.

In either case, the discussion has addressed all of my comments.

Thanks!

Ben.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf