Re: Last Call: draft-hoffman-dac-vbr (Vouch By Reference) to Proposed Standard
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Last Call: draft-hoffman-dac-vbr (Vouch By Reference) to Proposed Standard



>>The IANA Considerations section is missing.  I suggest registering
  the header as specified in RFC 3864.
>
>We purposely did not make this extensible in this document.

I think you're talking past each other here.  I read SM's message
as adding VBR-Info: to the list of known mail header lines here:

http://www.iana.org/assignments/message-headers/perm-headers.html

That seems reasonable.  I agree (having talked to the same companies)
that there is no point in making the header itself extensible at this
point.

R's,
John
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf



Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.