Re: Last Call: draft-hoffman-dac-vbr (Vouch By Reference) to Proposed Standard

From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman at vpnc.org>
To: John Levine <johnl at iecc.com>, ietf at ietf.org
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 09:23:48 -0800
In-reply-to: <20081107171357.22486.qmail at simone.iecc.com>
References: <20081107171357.22486.qmail at simone.iecc.com>

At 5:13 PM +0000 11/7/08, John Levine wrote:
> >>The IANA Considerations section is missing.  I suggest registering
>  the header as specified in RFC 3864.
>>
>>We purposely did not make this extensible in this document.
>
>I think you're talking past each other here.  I read SM's message
>as adding VBR-Info: to the list of known mail header lines here:
>
>http://www.iana.org/assignments/message-headers/perm-headers.html
>

<sigh> That's right, I misread SM's message. We'll include this in the next draft. Oh, and also fix the misspelling he found.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- Re: Last Call: draft-hoffman-dac-vbr (Vouch By Reference) to Proposed Standard
  - From: John Levine

Prev by Date: Re: Last Call: draft-hoffman-dac-vbr (Vouch By Reference) to Proposed Standard
Next by Date: The purpose of a Last Call
Previous by thread: Re: Last Call: draft-hoffman-dac-vbr (Vouch By Reference) to Proposed Standard
Next by thread: Re: Last Call: draft-hoffman-dac-vbr (Vouch By Reference) to Proposed Standard
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Last Call: draft-hoffman-dac-vbr (Vouch By Reference) to Proposed Standard

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.