Re: draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists

From: SM <sm at resistor.net>
To: ietf at ietf.org
Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2008 15:06:06 -0800
In-reply-to: <20081108220238.GD40482 at verdi>
References: <4915DE02.2010803 at nortel.com> <20081108220238.GD40482 at verdi>

At 14:02 08-11-2008, John Leslie wrote:

   First, a meta-comment:

   I hope we don't try to make a class of documents called IRTF BCPs.
The intent behind this, I hope, is to work on it in IRTF's ASRG, then
submit it to the IESG as an Individual Sumbission.

Standard Track and BCP RFCs are part of the IETF documentstream. The proposed IRTF document stream (draft-irtf-rfcs) doesn'tcreate a new class of documents called IRTF BCPs.

Shouldn't the headings of the two documents coming out of the ASRG be"Network Working Group" instead of "Anti-Spam Research Group" as theintended category is part of the IETF stream?


Regards,
-sm


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists
  - From: John Levine

References:
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists)
  - From: Chris Lewis
- draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists
  - From: John Leslie

Prev by Date: Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists)
Next by Date: Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists)
Previous by thread: draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists
Next by thread: Re: draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.