![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
On 4 Nov, 2008, at 07:50, Cyrus Daboo wrote:
Hi,--On November 4, 2008 6:28:19 AM -0800 The IESG <iesg- secretary at ietf.org> wrote:The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to considerthe following document: - 'DNS-Based Service Discovery ' <draft-cheshire-dnsext-dns-sd-05.txt> as an Informational RFCThe IANA section of the dns-sd draft describes a process for registration of SRV service identifiers, but there is another draft doing the same thing: <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft- gudmundsson-dns-srv-iana-registry-00.txt>.So which of these two drafts is meant to define the actual SRV service type registry?-- Cyrus Daboo
That text has been in DNS-SD since the start, back in 2001 when it was called "Discovering Named Instances of Abstract Services using DNS" (draft-cheshire-dnsext-nias-00.txt).
I have absolutely no ego at stake over ownership of that issue -- I simply put it in because someone pointed out that RFC 2782 failed to define an IANA registry for its service names, and since DNS-SD/NIAS depends on SRV records and identifying service types by name instead of number, without an IANA registry the specification would be somewhat handicapped.
Stuart Cheshire <cheshire at apple.com> * Wizard Without Portfolio, Apple Inc. * Internet Architecture Board * www.stuartcheshire.org _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.