![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
On 11 Nov 2008, at 15:38, Theodore Tso wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 05:12:56PM +0000, Steve Linford wrote:I certainly agree that there are hundreds of small DNSBLs run from kid's bedrooms which list on incomprehensible wildly over-broad policies and that such DNSBLs are both antagonistic and useless and as a result are used by almost nobody - that's 'market force'. But to pretend that thedozen major DNSBLs make listings based on "unauthenticated rumor" or"because the IP did not have 'mail.' or 'mx.'" is just silly mud- slinging itself based on equally "unauthenticated rumor" and is especially odd ifit's coming from within IETF itself.Let me get this straight.
Yes please...
It's OK to block e-mail messages on the basis of unauthenticated rumors
No. Steve Linford The Spamhaus Project http://www.spamhaus.org _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.