Re: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long)

From: Dave CROCKER <dhc2 at dcrocker.net>
To: ietf at ietf.org
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 07:41:19 -0800
In-reply-to: <49193FA7.7070101 at cisco.com>
References: <20081110213739.98316.qmail at simone.iecc.com> <49193FA7.7070101 at cisco.com>



Eliot Lear wrote:

On 11/10/08 10:37 PM, John Levine wrote:
What would be the point of yet another WG to reinvent this wheel?
I tend to agree. Here are a few questions for the IESG when consideringthis matter:

I strongly urge community and IESG folk to think carefully about the questionsEliot is asking and to post responses to them.


d/
--

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- Re: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long)
  - From: John Levine
- Re: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long)
  - From: Eliot Lear

Prev by Date: Re: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long)
Next by Date: Re: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long)
Previous by thread: Re: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long)
Next by thread: Re: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long)

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.