Re: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long)

From: Dave CROCKER <dhc2 at dcrocker.net>
To: michael.dillon at bt.com
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 07:42:45 -0800
In-reply-to: <C0F2465B4F386241A58321C884AC7ECC0945239E at E03MVZ2-UKDY.domain1.systemhost.net>
References: <C0F2465B4F386241A58321C884AC7ECC0945239E at E03MVZ2-UKDY.domain1.systemhost.net>



michael.dillon at bt.com wrote:

DNSBLs are a temporary band-aid solution for a badly broken
Internet email architecture.

DNS-based reputation lists have been in production use for at least 11 years?There is no industry move to reduce their use.


By what metric does this qualify as "temporary"?

d/

--

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long)
  - From: Keith Moore
- RE: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long)
  - From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip

References:
- RE: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long)
  - From: michael.dillon

Prev by Date: Re: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long)
Next by Date: Re: several messages
Previous by thread: RE: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long)
Next by thread: RE: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long)

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.