Re: several messages

From: Keith Moore <moore at network-heretics.com>
To: Steve Linford <linford at spamhaus.org>
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:42:49 -0500
In-reply-to: <A.1Kzv92-000JPz-Lg at smtp-ext-layer.spamhaus.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0811102352210.4124-100000 at citation2.av8.net> <A.1KzpIY-000GHV-TI at smtp-ext-layer.spamhaus.org> <491992AB.2030404 at peter-dambier.de> <A.1Kzv92-000JPz-Lg at smtp-ext-layer.spamhaus.org>

Steve Linford wrote:
> On 11 Nov 2008, at 15:11, Peter Dambier wrote:
> 
>> Hi Steve,
>>
>> sorry to mention spamhaus again,
>> but that is the reason why many german and especially austrian
>> mailoperators had to give up blacklisting completely ....
> 
> I do not think it is productive to use this ietf at ietf.org list for
> personal rants which have nothing to do with either the IETF or DNSBL
> technologies.

perhaps not, but if an organization can make assertions about the
quality of its services in support of a standardization question, then
surely it's also okay for users of those services to state their own
experiences.

Keith
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- Re: several messages
  - From: Steve Linford
- Re: several messages
  - From: Peter Dambier
- Re: several messages
  - From: Steve Linford

Prev by Date: Re: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long)
Next by Date: RE: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long)
Previous by thread: Re: several messages
Next by thread: Re: several messages
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: several messages

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.