Re: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long)

From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf at mit.edu>
To: Keith Moore <moore at network-heretics.com>
Cc: IETF <ietf at ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 11:12:42 -0500
In-reply-to: <49172BCE.2000705 at network-heretics.com> (Keith Moore's message of "Sun, 09 Nov 2008 13:28:30 -0500")
References: <49172BCE.2000705 at network-heretics.com>

Keith, I find myself in complete agreement with your message.  I
particularly like the fact that you took the time to go through a
complicated reasoning process in a slow, clear manner so that your
readers could determine whether they agree with your reasoning and if
not, where they disagree.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long)
  - From: Keith Moore

Prev by Date: Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists)
Next by Date: Re: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long)
Previous by thread: Re: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long)
Next by thread: Re: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long)

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.