Comment on draft-ietf-radext-design-05.txt

From: "Glen Zorn" <glenzorn at comcast.net>
To: <ietf at ietf.org>
Cc: iesg at ietf.org, radiusext at ops.ietf.org
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:47:23 -0600

This document is 36 pages long, yet devotes only a single paragraph to the
use of extended RADIUS attributes.  Since the extended attribute set is
likely the one to be most used in the future, this seems a rather gross
oversight.  I would suggest that the authors try to design a few extended
attribute sets and then document that experience.  I mention this at this
late date because I expected this note to become an RFC long before the
extended attributes doc, but (FWIW) the latter has completed WG "Last"
Call...

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Comment on draft-ietf-radext-design-05.txt
  - From: Alan DeKok

Prev by Date: Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists)
Next by Date: Re: draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists
Previous by thread: What Sort Of Jabber Server For IETF Conference?
Next by thread: Re: Comment on draft-ietf-radext-design-05.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Comment on draft-ietf-radext-design-05.txt

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.