Re: several messages

From: David Romerstein <romer at hanov3r.com>
To: ietf at ietf.org
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:18:24 -0800 (PST)
In-reply-to: <004d01c944fb$07a7fe60$6801a8c0 at oemcomputer>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0811111552410.4831-100000 at citation2.av8.net> <200811120023.TAA05922 at Sparkle.Rodents-Montreal.ORG> <004d01c944fb$07a7fe60$6801a8c0 at oemcomputer>

On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Randy Presuhn wrote:

Agreed, but if those analogies are correct, they also undermine the argument.
Neither the email sender nor the recipient (the ones to whom email is most
important) typically have any voice whatsoever in the selection of the DNSBL.

End recipients *absolutely* have a voice in the DNSbl selection process.They have the option of voting with their feet if their ISP chooses aDNSbl that negatively impacts them.


-- D

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: several messages
  - From: David Morris
- Re: several messages
  - From: Chris Lewis
- Re: several messages
  - From: Randy Presuhn

References:
- Re: several messages
  - From: der Mouse
- Re: several messages
  - From: Randy Presuhn

Prev by Date: Re: several messages
Next by Date: Re: several messages
Previous by thread: Re: several messages
Next by thread: Re: several messages
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: several messages

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.