Re: IPv6 traffic stats

[Peter Sherbin <pesherb at yahoo.com>]

> The AS count might also be of interest - 15% of the
> non-stub IPv4 addresses (AS's that offer transit to
> other ASes) also originate IPv6 prefixes.

How did this 15% change over the past 4 years and/or past 18 months? What percentage would that be of the total AS count? 

Thanks,

Peter


--- On Wed, 11/12/08, Geoff Huston <gih at apnic.net> wrote:

> From: Geoff Huston <gih at apnic.net>
> Subject: Re: IPv6 traffic stats
> To: "Harald Alvestrand" <harald at alvestrand.no>
> Cc: tytso at mit.edu, "Pekka Savola" <pekkas at netcore.fi>, ietf at ietf.org
> Date: Wednesday, November 12, 2008, 2:08 PM
> I've been looking at this as well and reported on the
> relative amount of IPv6 traffic over the past 4 years at the
> most recent NANOG
> (http://www.potaroo.net/presentations/2008-10-13-ipv6-deployment.pdf)
> 
> in recent times I am also seeing 0.5% of hosts preferring
> to use IPv6 to access a dual-stacked site - the good news it
> that this number has risen sharply in the past 18 months.
> The not-so-good news it thats its still a bloody small
> number!
> 
> The AS count might also be of interest - 15% of the
> non-stub IPv4 addresses (AS's that offer transit to
> other ASes) also originate IPv6 prefixes.
> 
> 
>    Geoff
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


      
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf